Topics
.jpg%3Fwidth%3D300&w=3840&q=75)
judicial reviewMilitary unit
Lawyers for companies subject to federal health, safety and environmental regulation hope that stringent substantive judicial review will relieve their clients of the burdens of much regulation without the need for troublesome legislative battles they seem unable to win. McGarity argues that assigning a Daubert-like (Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc) gatekeeper role to courts engaged in judicial review of agency risk assessments is a profoundly bad idea
In what he describes as a premortem on Joiner v. General Electric Co., a case before the Supreme C...
Risk assessment tools driven by algorithms offer promising advantages in predicting the recidivism r...
Over its most recent term, the U.S. Supreme Court has heard some of the most closely watched cases r...
Lawyers for companies subject to federal health, safety and environmental regulation hope that strin...
Judicial review of risk regulation rule making in the United States has been a highly controversial ...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc, the US Supreme Court empowered federal judges to reje...
This broad authority to assess risk, however, leaves too much discretion to administrative agencies....
As the number, cost, and complexity of federal regulations have grown over the past twenty years, th...
This special issue provides several perspectives on the potential and limits of judicial risk regula...
This paper describes four types of uncertainty confronted by decisionmakers undertaking risk assessm...
Since Daubert, courts have faced difficulty with screening cutting-edge scientific evidence pursuant...
Since the decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow, courts, legal scholars and the scientific community ha...
In both academic and legislative circles, risk assessment reform is currently a hot topic. In the la...
The role of generalist courts in reviewing the work of expert agencies is generally portrayed as ei...
In the US Supreme Court's Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc decision, federal judges were d...
In what he describes as a premortem on Joiner v. General Electric Co., a case before the Supreme C...
Risk assessment tools driven by algorithms offer promising advantages in predicting the recidivism r...
Over its most recent term, the U.S. Supreme Court has heard some of the most closely watched cases r...
Lawyers for companies subject to federal health, safety and environmental regulation hope that strin...
Judicial review of risk regulation rule making in the United States has been a highly controversial ...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc, the US Supreme Court empowered federal judges to reje...
This broad authority to assess risk, however, leaves too much discretion to administrative agencies....
As the number, cost, and complexity of federal regulations have grown over the past twenty years, th...
This special issue provides several perspectives on the potential and limits of judicial risk regula...
This paper describes four types of uncertainty confronted by decisionmakers undertaking risk assessm...
Since Daubert, courts have faced difficulty with screening cutting-edge scientific evidence pursuant...
Since the decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow, courts, legal scholars and the scientific community ha...
In both academic and legislative circles, risk assessment reform is currently a hot topic. In the la...
The role of generalist courts in reviewing the work of expert agencies is generally portrayed as ei...
In the US Supreme Court's Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc decision, federal judges were d...
In what he describes as a premortem on Joiner v. General Electric Co., a case before the Supreme C...
Risk assessment tools driven by algorithms offer promising advantages in predicting the recidivism r...
Over its most recent term, the U.S. Supreme Court has heard some of the most closely watched cases r...
Add to ORKG